User talk:Taivo
Hiiumaa piltide kategoriseerimisest[edit]
Nädalavahetusel Hiiumaale tehtud retke pilte hakkab lisanduma siia. Varasemast aastast on ka kaks kategooriat. Nende kategoriseerimist tasuks üle vaadata küll, et need paremini leitavad oleks. Vast ka mõningaid külade kategooriaid juurde tekitada. Kruusamägi (talk) 18:57, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
A quick question[edit]
Hello,
Back when you unblocked me, why didn't you tell me that "Asking others to make edits on your behalf is not appropriate. If you are desperately trying to edit wikis where you are blocked, please, please request a proper unblock. Please stop asking others.", as was the case with this other guy?
See, that is something that I wish Surjection or Chuck Entz (or even Justinrleung) had told me earlier. Seriously. Man, I wish I knew why none of them ever bothered to tell me anything like that. Shāntián Tàiláng (talk) 14:49, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
- I do not need to point [out] every possible violation and say, that you must not do that. Of course Masum Reza and Sebari are right: asking others to edit a wiki, where you are blocked, is prohibited as abusing multiple accounts. Taivo (talk) 15:52, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
- Well then, why was that apparently not the case with what I wrote on Eirikr's talk page? See, Calvinkulit was blocked for a very different reason--namely, WP:NOTHERE--than I was (mine was "disruptive edits").
And I have to say, Taivo, your command of English colloquial usage is a little, uh, thin. If I were you, I'd wanna ask Eirikr to check my grammar/word usage whenever I were to reply to anything written by a monolingual English speaker. Just giving ya some advice, don't take it too hard. Shāntián Tàiláng (talk) 22:14, 9 October 2023 (UTC)- This was a bad [piece of] advice. Eirikr has only 4 edits in Commons
on current year[in the current year]. I do not want to wait [a] whole month, until Eirikr comes back to Commons. Often [an] answer is needed on the same day.
And I want to say, that it is difficult to understand monolingual English speakers. They use difficultwords in sometimes strange context[words, sometimes in a strange context]. "Colloquial" – I did not know the word, but it was in my dictionary. "Command" – this word is usedin[with a] strange meaning, but by context I understand, that you point to my bad ability to write English. "Uh" – such a word is not in my dictionary, but by context I understand that the word has no special meaning. "Ya" – such word is not in my dictionary and even by context I do not understand, what it means. You see, monolingual English speakers use strange words like "uh" and "ya" without understanding that they are difficult to understand for non-native speakers. Conversation with non-native speakers is easier, because they use simpler words. Taivo (talk) 10:45, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
- This was a bad [piece of] advice. Eirikr has only 4 edits in Commons
- Well then, why was that apparently not the case with what I wrote on Eirikr's talk page? See, Calvinkulit was blocked for a very different reason--namely, WP:NOTHERE--than I was (mine was "disruptive edits").
- "Ya" is a colloquial form of "you". "Uh" is what they call a "filler word"; similar words are "like" and "um". "Er" and "erm" are spellings used in non-rhotic dialects.
(If I could pronounce the alveolar trill, I would mock non-rhotic dialects by rolling all my postvocalic r's, as in "You can talk about yerrr sheep dorrrgs" when reading this poem aloud.) - And speaking of "strange words"...when you get some free time, see if you can decipher all the mondegreens/"vocal puzzles" in this humorous Redneck Dictionary without the help of Eirikr, Surjection and Lugria. (For instance, "healthy" translates to "hell if he", and "insidious" translates to "instead he is".)
- And maybe you could ask Surjection, Chuck Entz, and/or Lugria to check your grammar/word usage, seeing how Eirikr isn't available. Shāntián Tàiláng (talk) 17:12, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
- Oh, and by the way, "asking others to edit a wiki, where you are blocked" is not prohibited if those other users "are able to show that the changes are either verifiable or productive and they have independent reasons for making such edits", per WP:PROXYING. I think Surjection might have raised the issue mainly because of his lack of expertise with the pages I've edited (that is, he automatically assumed they were disruptive because he didn't know enough about their language). Eirikr and Lugria didn't have that lack of expertise (unless where they indicated as such), so they clearly had their own reasons for making those edits. (I'm not sure about Justinrleung, though.)
Also, I have a feeling that Surjection also thought and still thinks (unlike Chuck Entz, who doesn't seem to think that anymore about me) that the act of not reverting those proxy- or sock-edits would give me an incentive to evade my block (that is, with IPs) even more. I have to say, I know for a fact that he has it backwards in my particular case. Just shedding some light on this proxy-editing thing for you. Don't take it too hard. Shāntián Tàiláng (talk) 16:01, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
Subject's consent for image[edit]
Hi there, you undid my edit on File:L'actrice Luna Kwok (Guo Yue) et le réalisateur Yeo Siew Hua, saying that "Permission from depicted person is not needed". Actually, it is required, see "Privacy rights" of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Image_use_policy: "When taking pictures of identifiable people, the subject's consent is not usually needed for straightforward photographs taken in a public place, but is often needed for photographs taken in a private place. This type of consent is sometimes called a model release, and it is unrelated to the photographer's copyright."
This picture was taken at a film festival screening, and therefore qualifies as a "photograph taken in a private place". Adsfghj (talk)
- At first, this is English Wikipedia policy, which does not apply in Commons. At second, film festival screening is a public, not private event. Taivo (talk) 08:23, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
- You can refer to the Wikimedia Commons policy here, which states "In many countries the subject's consent is needed to just take a picture, and/or to publish it ... even if the person is in a public place ... Commons requires photos to be legal in all of the following polities: (a) the country in which the photo was taken." Commons:Photographs of identifiable people.
- The photo was taken in France, which requires permission to take and publish a photo: Commons:Country specific consent requirements.
- I am undoing your edit. Adsfghj (talk) 05:50, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
- Discussion is going in Commons:Deletion requests/File:L'actrice Luna Kwok (Guo Yue) et le réalisateur Yeo Siew Hua.jpg. Adamant explained there, why consent is not needed and why we have subject's consent, although consent is not needed. Taivo (talk) 16:04, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:AN/B[edit]
--Juan Villalobos (talk) 11:59, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Kustutamise rasket tööd[edit]
See pilt MuISi järgi küll vaba ei ole. Kruusamägi (talk) 21:44, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
- Done. Taivo (talk) 15:40, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
- Palun kustutada ka see. Kruusamägi (talk) 22:02, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
- Done. Taivo (talk) 10:57, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
- Sai leitud, et ka selle peaks kustutama. Kruusamägi (talk) 22:25, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
- Done. Taivo (talk) 09:43, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
- Sai leitud, et ka selle peaks kustutama. Kruusamägi (talk) 22:25, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
- Done. Taivo (talk) 10:57, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
- Palun kustutada ka see. Kruusamägi (talk) 22:02, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
Stolen image discovered[edit]
Stolen image en:file:Right side of AMD-65.jpg#mw-jump-to-license found from IMFDB website [1]. 172.58.220.13 07:19, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
- Not done. I cannot do anything. The file does not exist in Commons, but in English Wikipedia. Please complain in en.wiki. Taivo (talk) 13:25, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
File talk:A nude man.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file talk, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. |
Sanjayti (talk) 10:08, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
Hi, This is quite a notable Indian school, so probably OK. Yann (talk) 11:16, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
- en:IIFD is a red link, search for name gives nothing. Taivo (talk) 11:19, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
- Commons notability criteria are much larger than Wikipedia. So even if it is not eligible for an article, it may be OK on Commons. Yann (talk) 11:21, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
- I am not sure what are the notability criteria for universities on Commons, but this is similar to en:Indian Institute of Fashion Technology. Yann (talk) 11:26, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
- I restored the logo and created a regular DR. Taivo (talk) 19:03, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
- I am not sure what are the notability criteria for universities on Commons, but this is similar to en:Indian Institute of Fashion Technology. Yann (talk) 11:26, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
- Commons notability criteria are much larger than Wikipedia. So even if it is not eligible for an article, it may be OK on Commons. Yann (talk) 11:21, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
US newspaper in Bengali language, probably OK. Yann (talk) 11:20, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
- en:Bangla Shangbad is a red link, search "Bangla Shangbad" gives almost nothing. Taivo (talk) 11:21, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
- I think magazines and newspapers with a regular publication are accepted on Wikidata, so their logos should be OK on Commons. Yann (talk) 11:23, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
- Done. I restored the logo and created a regular DR. Taivo (talk) 19:03, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
- I think magazines and newspapers with a regular publication are accepted on Wikidata, so their logos should be OK on Commons. Yann (talk) 11:23, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
Complex book covers can be in Commons only with VRT-permission from copyright holder (cover artist?). Taivo (talk) 12:28, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
- Dear Taivo, thank you for the attention to this photo, but the cover artist has no problems or claims concerning it. Copytron (talk) 17:53, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
- That case maybe he can send VRT-permission, which proves, that he has no claims. Taivo (talk) 19:09, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
- Taivo, rights owner have sent VRT-permission, which proves, that he has no claims. He did this in July. This is why the picture was recreated. There is completely no need to delete it again. Could you be so kind to undo this.--Copytron (talk) 16:43, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
- That case maybe he can send VRT-permission, which proves, that he has no claims. Taivo (talk) 19:09, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
@Copytron: I wrote about it in Commons:Volunteer Response Team/Noticeboard. Maybe somebody can search the permission e-mail. Your help is needed. Please write a permission number or other relevant data. File history does not show existence of the permission. Taivo (talk) 17:12, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
- For now, I learned that it was done by the rights holder 14th of July. Hope this is enough to find the permission and we will solve this issue with your kind help. Copytron (talk) 17:21, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
- Finally solved (I hope). Thank you, Taivo. Copytron (talk) 11:40, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Review[edit]
Hello, Taivo. Could you please review the File:Katrina Velarde - 2023.png license? Many thanks! -- Doclys👨⚕️👩⚕️ 🩺 • 💉 07:55, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
- Done. Taivo (talk) 11:40, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
Ühe foto taastamist[edit]
VRT-süsteemi jõudis kiri, kus fotograaf Aasmäe kurtis, et püüdis lisada fotot Marko Raadist, aga see kustutati ära. Tegemist on nähtavasti selle juhtumiga. Palun taasta File:M.RAAT_f.T.Aasmäe.jpg. Kruusamägi (talk) 08:09, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
- Done. @Kruusamägi: taastasin. Taivo (talk) 15:03, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
- Tänan! Luba on nüüd kinnitatud. Kruusamägi (talk) 22:48, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
About recent edits[edit]
Hello, I would like to say I am very sorry for edit warring on the File:Bipon-Chotai-speaking-to-Camilla-Duchess-of-Cornwall-scaled.jpg page.
My actions were in no way intended to cause dispute, and I shouldn't have done what I did. I should've communicated with you about the page before I engaged further, which I failed to do.
I promise this sort of thing will not happen ever again.
Many thanks, OnyxCrow22 OnyxCrow22 (talk) 18:53, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
Sir @Taivo, can you block @Haryplg for once again???... He oftenly and repeatedly uploading many copyrighted and trademarked radio and television networks, channels and stations in Indonesia logos without permission, just like this:
- https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&page=&subtype=&tagfilter=&type=upload&user=Haryplg&wpFormIdentifier=logeventslist&wpdate=&offset=&limit=500
- https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Haryplg
Thanks..... 2001:448A:1021:28B1:AC87:3C28:3265:7B7D 00:15, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
- Done. Taivo (talk) 15:10, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
Need review[edit]
- File:Nguyễn Minh Triết.jpg, like copyvio
183.182.121.140 10:28, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
Buenas, esta foto debería ser removido (deleted) o quedarse (keep)?? AbchyZa22 (talk) 00:24, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
- Done. I deleted the file. Taivo (talk) 10:45, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
content[edit]
Hello, can I use content from this website https://mpvidhansabha.nic.in/ 𝕃𝐖 (talk) 06:30, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose. I did not find any license on the site. Not work of Indian government, but work of member of parliament, presumably all copyrighted. Taivo (talk) 10:45, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
Check this file[edit]
@Taivo:Hi,please check and review these files File:Potential role of chronic physical exercise on immune system modulation in vitiligo patients.jpg and File:Autocrine and paracrine effects of exercise-regulated human myokines.png AbchyZa22 (talk) 18:39, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
- Done by others. Taivo (talk) 21:14, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
Review[edit]
Please review both images Shri Bhajan Lal Sharma and Shri Rajnath Singh & File:Shri Bhajan Lal Sharma.jpg. 𝕃𝐖 (talk) 14:11, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Done. Taivo (talk) 21:14, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
@Taivo:Buenas Taivo, esta foto debería ser removido (deleted) o quedarse (kept), porque según la foto representa el expresidente Marcos Perez Jimenez junto con la bandera y Escudo de Venezuela de 1954 (qué según la legislación venezolana se creó 1963 o antes, pronto 1964)?? AbchyZa22 (talk) 18:43, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
Veel natuke kustutamise tööd[edit]
Järgnevad failid võiks vast kustutada lasta: File:Ein tes.webp, File:160217-albert-einstein-09.jpg, File:ABSTRACT MOON.jpg ja File:An Elf Owl.jpg. Ülimalt kahtlased on ka selle kasutaja lisatud failid (ilmselgelt on seal lademetes autoriõiguste rikkumist). Kruusamägi (talk) 20:20, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
- Kustutasin umbes 300 Obedmakolo faili. Ma ei näinud seal ainsatki normaalset fotot. Taivo (talk) 20:37, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
- Seepärast ma ka tema faile eraldi linkima ei hakanud.
- Küll aga ei ole sa seni kustutanud faili "An Elf Owl.jpg", mis on nähtvasti aga autoriõiguste rikkumine, sest kuidas üks Nigeeria inimene seda Ameerikas elavat liiki pildistab ja foto veel sellise kvaliteediga on. Kui ta lisatud failid läbi vaadata, siis jäävad sealt silma ka File:An astronaut saluting the United States flag after landing in the moon.jpg, File:The biggest birds in the world.jpg, File:A specie of Dogs.jpg, File:The smallest specie of chameleons on earth.jpg, File:Lygodactylus.jpg ja File:A Lantern Shark.jpg, mis on teiste failidega võrreldes selgelt kahtlased. Kruusamägi (talk) 22:46, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
- Juhin veelkord tähelepanu neile ilmsetele autoriõiguste rikkumistele. Kruusamägi (talk) 09:42, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
Note[edit]
Hello, I requested deletion of my edit notice but you also accidentally deleted my userboxes. Please undelete the userboxes page. Cheers, —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - useless contributions} 20:23, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
- Done. They both were separately in speedy deletions category. I hope it's good now. Taivo (talk) 20:36, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
Happy holidays![edit]
* Happy Holidays! * | ||
|
--Wilfredor (talk) 12:28, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2024! | |
Hello Taivo, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2024. Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
ᴀlbanɢeller (talk) 20:14, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for change Template:Potd/2023-12-27. But you changed Template:Potd/2023-12-27 (en), changed Template:Potd/2023-12-27 (de) and didn't change Template:Potd/2023-12-27 (ru). If you don't know Russian you can write on my talkpageб. I know and I created this template. It turns out that Russian language is no longer important for you? (уже не важный язык?) Brateevsky {talk} 16:25, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
- Язык всё-таки важный. А если Achim откатал мою правку, я думал: а может не нужно? И больше ничего не изменил. Я запомню, что в будущем могу спрашивать переводов от вас. Taivo (talk) 18:49, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
LicenseReview[edit]
Hi Taivo, can you please review the {{CC BY 4.0}} licence for Jacques Delors (1993).jpg? Thanks, ᴀlbanɢeller (talk) 01:52, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- Done. Taivo (talk) 13:47, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you. ᴀlbanɢeller (talk) 02:15, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Sooviavaldus piltide kustutamiseks[edit]
Faile see ja see soovitakse kustutada. Fotograaf on kustutamisega nõus. Neid pilte artiklites ei kasutata (inimesest pole vikiartikleid). Kruusamägi (talk) 16:58, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
- Done. Taivo (talk) 12:56, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
It's exactly like Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sankebetsu incident newspaper.jpg: A Japanese camera around 2010 had only bad captured that old 1915's photo in the page of Kimura Moritake's book, published for the first time in 1994. Can you delete it as Japanese copyvio (published before 1 January 1957, photographed before 1 January 1947)? Thank you. Nanafuji (talk) 12:31, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Not done. Sankebetsu incident photo had double copyright: of depicted object (old photo, copyright expired due to age) and of modern photographer (no permission – that was reason for deletion). Yamamoto Heikichi photo has only single copyright: of depicted object (expired due to age). No copyright of modern photographer is here, because photographer did not do any creative work. Taivo (talk) 12:56, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- But it's also very bad as photo, since it was captured from that book opened as seen very better in the first version of the upload: the same for "Italo e Floriano Calvino.jpg". It's better to find the same photo exposed at Tomamae Bear Museum. Can you delete it? Nanafuji (talk) 13:14, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, I can, but I do not delete it. At first better version of the same photo must be uploaded. Taivo (talk) 13:29, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- No, you can already delete it. It's not very important and there isn't already when Heikichi Yamamoto's Japanese wikipedia page was created: this is the full camera of that book. Can you do also "Italo e Floriano Calvino.jpg" since is very bad and incomplete in the camera? Nanafuji (talk) 14:37, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Of course I can, but I already said, that I do not delete them. And bad quality is not a reason for speedy deletion anyway. Taivo (talk) 14:56, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- You can do it for "copyvio". Nanafuji (talk) 14:57, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- It's not. Taivo (talk) 14:58, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- I've added "Yamamoto Heikichi (1913).jpg". Now you can delete "Yamamoto Heikichi.jpg" as "duplicate" (I can't add the tag since you've protected it), and it's not necessary a redirect to the new one. Nanafuji (talk) 10:52, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- No. Please do not write to my talkpage more. The files can stay in Commons. Taivo (talk) 16:58, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- This is the correct reason for speedy deletion: "Exact or scaled-down duplicate (F8): File:Yamamoto Heikichi (1913).jpg". Nanafuji (talk) 17:00, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- They are not exact duplicates. For example, colors are different. Crop is different as well, you can see whole rifle on old version, but not whole rifle on new version. Taivo (talk) 17:21, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- No, they're exactly duplicates. In my version, I've only removed the part with the unnecessary Japanese description, as well unnecessary parts of the book's page. The photo of Yamamoto is the same. Then, can you do what I've asked you, so it's closed? Or in alternative unblock the page so I can tagged a request? Nanafuji (talk) 19:15, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- They are not exact duplicates. For example, colors are different. Crop is different as well, you can see whole rifle on old version, but not whole rifle on new version. Taivo (talk) 17:21, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- This is the correct reason for speedy deletion: "Exact or scaled-down duplicate (F8): File:Yamamoto Heikichi (1913).jpg". Nanafuji (talk) 17:00, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- No. Please do not write to my talkpage more. The files can stay in Commons. Taivo (talk) 16:58, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- I've added "Yamamoto Heikichi (1913).jpg". Now you can delete "Yamamoto Heikichi.jpg" as "duplicate" (I can't add the tag since you've protected it), and it's not necessary a redirect to the new one. Nanafuji (talk) 10:52, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- It's not. Taivo (talk) 14:58, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- You can do it for "copyvio". Nanafuji (talk) 14:57, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Of course I can, but I already said, that I do not delete them. And bad quality is not a reason for speedy deletion anyway. Taivo (talk) 14:56, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- No, you can already delete it. It's not very important and there isn't already when Heikichi Yamamoto's Japanese wikipedia page was created: this is the full camera of that book. Can you do also "Italo e Floriano Calvino.jpg" since is very bad and incomplete in the camera? Nanafuji (talk) 14:37, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, I can, but I do not delete it. At first better version of the same photo must be uploaded. Taivo (talk) 13:29, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- But it's also very bad as photo, since it was captured from that book opened as seen very better in the first version of the upload: the same for "Italo e Floriano Calvino.jpg". It's better to find the same photo exposed at Tomamae Bear Museum. Can you delete it? Nanafuji (talk) 13:14, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- FYI I also refused to delete these files, as they are not exact or smaller duplicates. Yann (talk) 20:30, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
I've finally founded a very proper photo from this site. Please, can you upload it as "File:Heikichi Yamamoto.jpg", and delete or redirect "File:Yamamoto Heikichi (1913).jpg" and "File:Yamamoto Heikichi.jpg"? Thank you. 95.236.238.19 09:13, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- Not done. Yes, I can do that, but I do not want to do that. Taivo (talk) 09:57, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- Then can you only upload it, and left the other two? 82.60.173.59 10:01, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, I can do that, but I do not want to do that either. Taivo (talk) 10:03, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- It's very better if you upload it as a new version for "File:Yamamoto Heikichi (1913).jpg", so we can left "File:Yamamoto Heikichi.jpg" as the full version. Please, do it so it's definitely closed. Thank you. 79.20.12.122 09:39, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Anonymous Hong Kong Photographer 1[edit]
Hi Tavio,
Recently it came to my attention that one of their sock, Special:Contributions/KamUTsingRM 3320, has been uploading a lot of incorrectly named or categorized files. (see Category:Photos by Anonymous Hong Kong Photographer 1 pending rename for files in question) Considering the scale of the clean-up required, their behaviors are disruptive. I noticed your comments on Category:Sockpuppets of Anonymous Hong Kong Photographer 1 to not block them. Should such exempt stand? There is a discussion on village pump. (Commons:Village pump#Problematic file names and irrelevant categorization by sockpuppet group) I would love to hear your opinion. Mys_721tx (talk) 08:05, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, in my opinion the exempt should stand. I do not know, why the names are incorrect, but I do not understand Chinese at all. Taivo (talk) 08:17, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- Can you please explain the reason for why the exemption should be held, as suggested that the spp group's behaviour are disruptive? The naming of many files they uploaded are nonsensical, with examples of a giant text in the image saying it's station A, while the file name and categorisation by the spp group suggests otherwise. It is to such a large scale that clearly constitutes disruption, and the misnaming of files and miscategorisation happens in the English language, so not understanding the Chinese language isn't really a valid reason to not investigate further. Do please prove your point on why an exemption is granted for such disruption, on what policy basis was the exemption granted initially, or otherwise how it does not constitute disruption at all. LuciferianThomas 17:16, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
- I have not seen any disruption from the user. Yes, there are almost thousand files in the category, but I am not convinced, that the files really need renaming, and I am not convinced, that this constitutes a systematic disruption. I have worked with uploads of the user in the past and generally the uploads were enough good. Commons community discussed the user 4 years ago here and decided to make such exemption for him. No policy exists, because there is no other such user and it's pointless to make a policy for one user only. Taivo (talk) 18:01, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
- I am also not convinced by your "not convinced" as you have still been unable to give an actual reason as to how the issues that I point out that the files are incorrectly named, apart from your vague "do not know" and "am not convinced".
- File:HK East Rail Line MTR platform TKO Station August 2021 SS2.jpg – TKO station is not even on the East Rail Line.
- File:HK MTR Lohas Park Station concourse stairs July 2021 SS2.jpg – LOHAS Park station is not even green in colour.
- File:HK Kwun Tong MTR Line platform May 2021 SS2 01.jpg – image shows Tseung Kwan O line, not Kwun Tong line, simply from the line livery.
- File:HK SKD TKO 將軍澳 Tseung Kwan O 坑口 Hang Hau Station MTR exit entrance night January 2022 Px3.jpg, File:HK SKD TKO 將軍澳 Tseung Kwan O 坑口 Hang Hau Station MTR concourse pay gates platform night January 2022 Px3.jpg, File:HK TKO 寶琳站 Po Lam Station concourse map exit signs night May 2023 Px3 03.jpg – Files labeled the wrong station even if there are clear signs displaying that the stations are not the station in the file names.
- This is just a short list of a few that I found. Do you really need a comprehensive compiled list of hundreds of files to be "convinced" that it is systematic disruption? LuciferianThomas 07:34, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
- I am also not convinced by your "not convinced" as you have still been unable to give an actual reason as to how the issues that I point out that the files are incorrectly named, apart from your vague "do not know" and "am not convinced".
- I have not seen any disruption from the user. Yes, there are almost thousand files in the category, but I am not convinced, that the files really need renaming, and I am not convinced, that this constitutes a systematic disruption. I have worked with uploads of the user in the past and generally the uploads were enough good. Commons community discussed the user 4 years ago here and decided to make such exemption for him. No policy exists, because there is no other such user and it's pointless to make a policy for one user only. Taivo (talk) 18:01, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
- Can you please explain the reason for why the exemption should be held, as suggested that the spp group's behaviour are disruptive? The naming of many files they uploaded are nonsensical, with examples of a giant text in the image saying it's station A, while the file name and categorisation by the spp group suggests otherwise. It is to such a large scale that clearly constitutes disruption, and the misnaming of files and miscategorisation happens in the English language, so not understanding the Chinese language isn't really a valid reason to not investigate further. Do please prove your point on why an exemption is granted for such disruption, on what policy basis was the exemption granted initially, or otherwise how it does not constitute disruption at all. LuciferianThomas 17:16, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
Check image[edit]
@Taivo:Hi Taivo ,please check and review this File:Hypothesized biological mechanisms underlying the role of exercise-induced IL-6 in primary and secondary cancer prevention.jpg (Google translator) AbchyZa22 (talk) 12:54, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- Done. Taivo (talk) 18:32, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Taivo:Hi, please check and review (File:The model depicts a mechanistic linkage between muscle activation by WB-EMS-mediated resistance exercise and cancer cell death in advanced cancer disease.jpg) (Google translator) AbchyZa22 (talk) 22:31, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
Request for revdel[edit]
Hello, would you mind just revdelling the old revision of File:Премиерот Ковачевски во работна посета на Самитот на ЕУ - Западен Балкан, во Брисел -14.12.2023- (53397186881).jpg? It has a copyrighted logo, also look at this DR. Cheers, —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - useless contributions} 18:28, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
- Done. Taivo (talk) 18:32, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
Sockpuppets of Anonymous Hong Kong Photographer 1 has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
RZuo (talk) 10:53, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
@Taivo:Buenas,está foto debería quedarse (keep) o remover (deleted)?? AbchyZa22 (talk) 14:00, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- Done. Taivo (talk) 16:07, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Kahtlasi faile[edit]
See näeb vägagi välja kui potentsiaalne autoriõiguste rikkumine. Kruusamägi (talk) 15:28, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
Ayuda en UDR (Undeletion Request)[edit]
@Taivo:Buenas, por favor en el Commons:Undeletion Request (en la parte de "File:Tarjeta electoral Partido Regional Progresistas Merideños Independientes.jpg") esta en el Dominio Público ({{PD-VenezuelaGov}}/{{PD-textlogo}}) porque ese logo es un partido político regional en Venezuela (en la parte Commons:Undeletion requests) AbchyZa22 (talk) 18:25, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Taivo:Buenas con respecto a "License says, that "Intellectual products generated under an employment relationship in the public sector" are ineligible for copyright. Is the political party part of public sector?", te voy a responder, si forma parte de un partido político del sector público AbchyZa22 (talk) 11:27, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Taivo:Buenas, por favor en el Undeletion Request (en la parte "File:Logo Alcaldía Municipio Blvno Angostura (2021-2025).jpg") esta en el Dominio Público (PD-VenezuelaGov) AbchyZa22 (talk) 17:43, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- You uploaded the photo with incorrect license PD-textlogo. Now please create an undeletion request in COM:UDEL and say, that the correct license is PD-VenezuelaGov. Now you see, how important is uploading files with correct license. Taivo (talk) 17:46, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Taivo:Thank you, but i tagged (PD-textlogo) a mistake (Google translator) AbchyZa22 (talk) 19:15, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Taivo:Buenas, por favor en el COM:UDEL (en la parte "File:Logo Alcaldía Municipio Blvno Angostura (2021-2025).jpg") esta foto debería ser restaurada (support) o no restaurar (oppose)?? AbchyZa22 (talk) 12:26, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Taivo:Thank you, but i tagged (PD-textlogo) a mistake (Google translator) AbchyZa22 (talk) 19:15, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- You uploaded the photo with incorrect license PD-textlogo. Now please create an undeletion request in COM:UDEL and say, that the correct license is PD-VenezuelaGov. Now you see, how important is uploading files with correct license. Taivo (talk) 17:46, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Taivo:Buenas, por favor en el Undeletion Request (en la parte "File:Logo Alcaldía Municipio Blvno Angostura (2021-2025).jpg") esta en el Dominio Público (PD-VenezuelaGov) AbchyZa22 (talk) 17:43, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Category:Olha Ginsburg and Category:Olha Ginzburg.[edit]
Hi. please combine the stories of Category:Olha Ginsburg and Category:Olha Ginzburg and leave the first title. Thanks. Бучач-Львів (talk) 11:59, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Seems like Done. Taivo (talk) 10:10, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
This Deletion Request[edit]
Dear Taivo,
Can you please reconsider the above DR and replace the old low resolution image which I took and replace it with this much higher resolution image--from the same museum--here of the same object. Then you can delete my original image as I suggested.
I believe that WikiCommons should have the highest resolution image possible and the image I took in 2008 is low quality and replacable. The key thing is the iamge is replacable. Why would wikipedia use a poor quality image when there is a better quality replacement which is the point of my DR above?
I had asked Gbawden this on his talkpage but he has been away. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 23:55, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Please replace yourself 5 remaining uses in another projects. After that I can delete the file. Taivo (talk) 10:17, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: I have now replaced all uses of this image in this DR with the superior quality image. Please delete my low resolution image. Thank You and Goodnight from Canada, --Leoboudv (talk) 12:37, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
- Done. Taivo (talk) 12:43, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
FYI[edit]
You deleted Category:Amanda Maria. Your deletion log entry says (content was: "{{speedydelete|empty}}"
.
I just added Category:Amanda Maria to File:Amanda Maria.jpg. That image was uploaded 2 months ago. So... the category is no longer empty.
I see that the two remaining images from the uploader say "Own". Cameras have had self-timers for decades now. So, FWIW, I find that "Own" credible. Geo Swan (talk) 00:49, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
- Done. Taivo (talk) 15:36, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Taastamist[edit]
Arusaamatul põhjusel on kustutatud File:Valisluureamet-logo-color-est RGB.png. Riigiameti logona ei allu see autoriõiguslikele piirangutele. Palun taasta. Kruusamägi (talk) 09:35, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
- Done. Põhjus on täiesti arusaadav: litsentsi polnud. Taastasin ja lisasin litsentsi. Taivo (talk) 15:36, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
@Taivo:Buenas, esta foto debería ser removido (deleted) o quedarse (keep)?? AbchyZa22 (talk) 12:03, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
- Done. Taivo (talk) 15:36, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Taivo:why "uploader's request, incorrect license."?? AbchyZa22 (talk) 15:51, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
@Taivo:Buenas,esta foto debería ser removido (deleted) o quedarse (kept)?? AbchyZa22 (talk) 23:08, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
GokuJuan[edit]
Hi Taivo, I'm sorry to bother you and communicate with you in these circumstances, but the user insists on insulting me even when blocked, this time he has done it in English, so there is no need to translate or explain what is happening... Taichi (talk) 21:54, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- Done. One month block without talkpage access. Taivo (talk) 12:12, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
LicenseReview 2[edit]
Hi Taivo, can you please review the {{CC BY 4.0}} licence for John Bruton (2002).jpg? Thanks, ᴀlbanɢeller (talk) 11:16, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- Done on the same day. Taivo (talk) 10:17, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for applying the block to User:Pupusareawesome. However, I think you may have deleted File:Aspergillus caatingaensis.jpg by mistake. I think this is the file where I added source details earlier today. The source page says the research paper was released as CC-BY 4.0. If this page wasn't edited by me today, can you please check my deleted edits? I definitely added source details to one of the user's uploads that were probably deleted in the same batch. From Hill To Shore (talk) 12:36, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
- @From Hill To Shore: I am ready to restore the file, but I did not find evidence, that the source (Wikidata item Q98778929) is published under suitable license. Source site https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/wfbi/sim/2020/00000095/00000001/art00003;jsessionid=lrh58f3e3rl.x-ic-live-02 said "Content available via Ingenta Connect is available for download only." Taivo (talk) 12:49, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry, I didn't realise the Wikidata DOI link pointed to a different version. The Science Direct version at https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166061620300129 says it is CC-BY 4.0 just under the author names. From Hill To Shore (talk) 13:01, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
- Done. I restored the image due to successful license review. Taivo (talk) 13:20, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry, I didn't realise the Wikidata DOI link pointed to a different version. The Science Direct version at https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166061620300129 says it is CC-BY 4.0 just under the author names. From Hill To Shore (talk) 13:01, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
File:Charles Aidman.jpg[edit]
Hello Taivo, could you check this image please?, this is a screenshot from the TV series en:The Fugitive (1963 TV series) which is still copyrighted. Byejai (talk) 12:21, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
Hi! This media is in Pubilc Domain, as mentioned in the metadata: insignia + PD-BrazilGov. Could you please revert the nomination for deletion, please. SSoster (WMB) (talk) 16:57, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Not done. No, I do not do that, and in my opinion the PD-BrazilGov license is wrong. Taivo (talk) 17:00, 4 March 2024 (UTC)